Monday, February 25, 2013


Despite the many efforts over the years to squash the 9/11 truth movement, the debate rages on, but this time across the pond in the UK.
On Monday, February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, an unusual opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement comes to bear.
For three hours, detailed evidence surrounding the 911 terror attacks will be presented to a court of law, where British citizens will be challenging the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) on the validity of two documentaries that were shown on the BBC in September of 2011, marking the 10 year anniversary of the tragedy.
According to Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth (AE911Truth), the activists said to be largely responsible for establishing the court appearance, by showing a set of documentaries that were marred with inaccuracies and biased towards the establishment's version of the events, “the BBC was therefore in breach of the operating requirements of the BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.”
Regarding the alleged breach of contract, AE911Truth recently stated that “Section 15 of the UK Terrorism Act 2000, Article 3, states that it is an offense to provide funds for public programming if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism.”
Their claim is that “the BBC withheld scientific evidence that demonstrates the official version of the events of 9/11 is not possible and that the BBC has actively attempted to discredit those people attempting to bring this evidence to the public.”
But by doing this, they claim, “the BBC is also supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 that have not yet been identified and held to account.”
The twist to the story, however, is that the producer of the documentaries, Tony Rooke, is one of the individuals actually helping to shed light on the version of the events that have been supported by the 9/11 truth movement for over a decade.
Because the people in the United Kingdom are required to pay an annual TV license fee which is used to fund these types of documentaries, according to AE911Truth, Tony has refused to pay his TV license fee on the basis of specific anti-terrorism legislation.
Because Rooke has been subsequently charged with a crime for not paying his TV license fee, by issuing a legal challenge to this charge, Tony has successfully garnered an opportunity for an appearance in a Magistrate’s court, where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge.
In order to beat the rap and avoid being convicted for failing to pay his annual TV license fee, Tony has no choice but to prove the documentaries in question are not subject to the licensing fees, due to the fact that they were inaccurate and supported a flawed official version of the events and may actually be aiding and abetting the real criminals behind the attacks.
Considering the British government fell in perfect lockstep with the Americans and became a willing participant in subsequent military invasions and occupations of countries that would eventually be seen as having nothing to do with the attacks, Rooke's claim that the very documentaries he helped produce with British taxpayer money happen to be knowingly flawed with lies and distortions, becomes a very serious claim.
If successfully argued Monday, this would not only potentially allow Rooke to escape any charges and subsequent penalties for not paying the TV tax, proving the programs were delegating false and inaccurate information that was bias toward the official version of the events would also give credence to the 9/11 truth movement itsef and its attempt for a long-awaited, truly independent investigation into the events and the social disaster that was created in the wake of the attack.
The Aftermath
The crime that occurred on September 11, 2001, in the heart of New York City, was more than just an attack on the city itself, it was an attack on the heart of the American people. Far more than just a staggering loss of life and the rest of the day off for everyone else that wasn't breathing an immense amount of poison pouring from an epic pile of toxic rubble, the tragedy of that day would end up being the excuse for the, just-as-tragic, loss of a more innocent day and age in American history, as well as many other parts of the Western world.
Subsequently reacting in as draconian a fashion as any actions taken by a government, monarchy or dictatorship in recent history, Americans would ultimately be forced by their own government and media to relinquish the very way of life that had come to be known as the freest and the most prosperous nation the world had ever seen.
Since that day, what has emerged in it's place is a gigantic growth in the size of government, thanks to the advent of multiple enormous federal policing agencies like the TSA, followed by an always proportionally equal loss of liberty and an ever-intensifying police state that is literally beginning to resemble more a dystopian nightmare novel than the free society once prospering within “US” borders.
Thanks to legislation like the so-called “Patriot” Act, strangely prepared prior to the event actually occurring, people from all walks of life and from every square inch of the country are now being publicly tracked and traced. From the places they go to the purchases they make to the conversations taking place on cell phones and computers, using the mind-bending justification, “if you have nothing to hide then you should have nothing to worry about,” everything Americans do is admittedly being monitored, recorded and stored in monstrous databases for future government use.
For those who would ass-u-me it couldn't get any worse or it wouldn't happen here, the US is now set to resemble a war zone as “officials” propose the use of unmanned drones that, even the same media who swore it would never come to this is now admitting, are likely to fill the skies over America in the very near future.
The America people knew only one short generation ago is now, less than a decade later, appearing to look more like a scene from inside the USSR during its heyday, but from a futuristic, sci-fi perspective instead.
Despite strict warnings by the founders to never relinquish liberty for the promise of a safety that can never be truly provided, Americans largely stood by as, much like the gun-rights argument of today, Washington politicians stripped some of the most basic and fundamental, prosperity-producing, rights and liberties once afforded by the Constitution, in the name of events used and overused as justification.
If whoever it was that attacked us truly did it because they “hate us for our freedoms,” as President Bush so eloquently illustrated during the many speeches given in response to the attacks and during the fraudulent buildup to the Iraq war, now ironically even being admitted by the mainstream media itself, politicians all over the country did just as much to erode those freedoms with legislation, after the fact, than any terrorist could have ever done with weapons of any size and scope.
The Investigation
For the first half of the decade, following the most grandiose crime America had ever seen, the media drowned the airwaves with the constant drumming of an ever-present threat of terror. Teleprompter-puppets in every corner of the Western world were proselytizing a regurgitated form of official propaganda to the point the people in the US were wrapping their houses in plastic, in fear of the next terror attack that also never came.
While the eventually-admitted made-up terror threat levels continued to peak and valley, as the months following the attacks began to mount, so too did the cries for an investigation into events being used as an excuse to treat the American people like a group of 300 million potential terrorists.
But while the people continued to demand an investigation, despite 9/11 being the biggest crime perpetrated on American soil in the country's history, the Bush administration would do everything it could to prevent one from occurring. It wasn't until after months of mounting pressure when those in charge of taking the next step finally felt it necessary to begin forming a committee that would ultimately end up being the 9/11 Commission.
Despite an equally odd way in which the committee was formed and the very controversial figures that were first pushed as who should head the investigation, the Kean-Hamilton National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission) was assembled to handle the task. Almost a full year after a crime so grand it would change the very way in which Americans would live out their daily lives, the victims and families of that tragic day would finally be getting the information they deserved, so they hoped.
Months into the two-year investigation however, it became clear the commission was being met with great resistance. An original reluctance to even begin an investigation in the first place transformed into a campaign that would be seen by those paying attention as some of the most suspicious activities ever seen acted out by public officials, supposedly having nothing to do with the events, other than dealing with them once they happened.
As the commission co-chairs would eventually write in books released after the so-called investigation came to pass, every step was met with a complete reluctance to participate or cooperate with investigators along the way and the “underfunded, understaffed and overburdened” committee was completely unable to perform the duties prescribed.
In addition to refusing to testify under oath, both Bush and Cheney also refused to testify separately and never truly answered any of the most important questions they were given.
The commission even threatened at one point to bring charges forth against certain Pentagon officials that had been caught lying under oath about events that had transpired during the attack on the Pentagon, but ultimately that too became an eventual non-issue, was swept under the rug, with the only thing transpiring being the further deconstruction of any remaining assemblance of a legitimate investigation.
While dealing with the impossible task of embarking on a journey that was doomed to failure from its very foundation, it didn't take long before the commission itself began having internal problems of their own. A few months into the investigation, 9/11 Commissioner, Senator Max Cleland, abruptly resigned as a commissioner on the grounds that the entire investigation was a hoax and was therefore a total waste of time and taxpayer money.
After all was said and done, what the commission did ultimately end up releasing as the “9/11 Commission Report” was a totally whitewashed version of the events, merely parroting much of the same story that was told by the media on the day the events transpired, during on the spot media analysis and assumptions being made, prior to any actual official investigating. Nothing but pure speculation.
What We Know
Since the investigation ended and the commission was disbanded after its final recommendation on August 21, 2004, more than half of the individuals who served on the original 9/11 Commission have made statements in favor of re-opening the investigation or, bare minimum, having admitted to the original “investigation” being fatally flawed from the beginning.
According to Commission Chairman Thomas Kean, investigators were barred from viewing any of the evidence that truly mattered, the commission was underfunded, undermanned and ultimately not allowed to carry out the task for which is had been supposedly assigned.
Summing up the dire circumstances, during an interview with the CBC, committee Co-Chair Lee Hamilton made the statement, “We thought we were set up to fail. We got started late. We had a very short time-frame... Indeed we had to get it extended and we did not have enough money.” Coming to the conclusion it was all because “they were afraid we were going to hang somebody... That we would point the finger.”
Chairman Thomas Kean, during a subsequent book tour, reiterated those same sentiments by making the claim, “we think the commission, in many ways, was set up to fail because we didn't have enough money, we didn't have enough time and we'd been appointed by some of the most partisan people in Washington.”
As if all that weren't startling enough, while pulling the all-too-common “national security” card on the American people, the Bush administration even combed through the final report before it was released to the American people, editing it down ever further, to a version that could almost be used as the script for a Disney movie.
The vast majority of eyewitness accounts and any of the evidence that contradicted what would be eventually released as the final report was discarded to the cutting room floor and memory-holed as if it never existed.
Multiple other commissioners have since come forward as well, making statements that vary from being suggestive to coming right out and saying that a new, truly independent, investigation should be attempted by the American people. Even making the charge, in some cases, that Americans still don't know what actually happened and the victims and their families deserve to know a truth that has yet to told.
From the shocking admissions by the commission that the entirety of the commission itself was a group of individuals that all had moderate to severe conflicts of interest, with regard to the investigation and corporations that were tied in various ways to the event itself, any vestige of hope that the American people were given any real answers to who, what, where, when and why the events took place, other than the obvious, can be thrown out the window in its entirety.
What now?
Considering the fact that what the government put out, as its version of what took place during the attacks of September 11, 2001, cannot possibly be seen as a version that can be accepted with any reasonable sense of credibility, as admitted to by many of the 9/11 commissioners themselves, the only thing left to do is turn to the American people and the most credible individuals that have already been investigating the events since the very day they occurred.
While many individuals and scientific organizations connected to the establishment, like NOVA and Popular Mechanics, have tried to attempt tackling the impossible task of single-handedly proving the legitimacy of an admittedly flawed and totally whitewashed official report, many truly independent investigators and organizations, not somehow tied with strange conflicts of interest, yet still committed to finding out what truly happened that day, have put together the pieces that still exist and have come to some very startling conclusions, completely contrary to those given by the government and individuals supposedly sworn to uphold the Constitution and enforce the rule of law.
Despite the efforts of institutions like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, now consisting of more than 1700 licensed and retired architects and engineers all agreeing the official story couldn't have happened the way it was officially scripted, the media and mainstream journalists all over the Western world continue to denounce and demonize every effort to not only drum up support for a new investigation that can be considered legitimate by every member of the human community, but also all attempts to theorize what actually happened, even based on the evidence that obviously exists.
The same thing the establishment and its media have been doing since the very beginning is the same thing the establishment and its media are doing today. Any attempt to shed light on the terrorist attacks of 9/11, if the information doesn't jive with the official narrative (...that 19 radical Muslim hijackers hijacked four commercial airliners on the morning of September 11, 2001 and slammed them into both World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon, leaving only the fourth to be brought down prior to being slammed into a high-profile building of its own, ultimately causing the collapses of both towers and a portion of the Pentagon) is deemed total quackery and, according to the media and its many unwitting followers, sheer conspiracy theory and not feasibly seen as legitimate.
All this, despite the 9/11 commissioners themselves agreeing that the official investigation is a total hoax.
Which brings us to Monday, February 24, 2013
The world will be watching Monday as BBC journalist Tony Rooke and two seasoned 911 truth investigators from AE9/11Truth take on the establishment and its “official” version of the events. Millions around the globe will be anxious to hear the details of the hearing and what eventually transpires after three hours of testimony attempts to refute the official story.
Any rational member of society that has been offered the set of facts presented in this article however would likely, eventually come to the conclusion that the American people, much like the events surrounding the assassination of JFK, may never actually truly get to the bottom of the circumstances.
Without attempting to be a party crasher and put negative juju on the event before it even happens, what makes anyone believe a new debate in the UK is going to garner a different result and all of a sudden lead to a worldwide awakening that leads to the establishment and its media actually changing course and attempting to actually get to the bottom of what happened that day?
Does anyone actually believe, even if the evidence presented to the magistrate on Monday sways him to the point he ultimately agrees with the 9/11 truth activists and their version of the events, that the Western establishment and its mainstream media will follow suit and all the sudden change a decade-long official story and subsequent attempts to make 9/11 "truthers" look foolish?
If in fact it ever fully emerges that the twin towers were, as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth asserts, brought down with explosives and technologically advanced, professional building demolition charges, made of a substance known as “Thermate,” the situation that would immediately ensue would force everyone to not only come to terms with a reality about the world and its leaders and see them in a much different light, it would also potentially cause many of them to be arrested and tried for treason and high crimes and misdemeanors... Also proving to the world that the mainstream media has been lying to the American people and the Western world the entire time, forcing the media to openly admit their own flaws and crimes as well.
Any guesses on the likelihood that happens any time soon, regardless of what ultimately transpires in a tiny UK court Monday?

No comments:

Post a Comment