IS NEW OZ PM HEAD OF SATANIST LODGE?

REPOST. Originally posted within The Mikiverse, August 3, 2010.

July 13, 2010 by Henry Makow Ph. D

In a dramatic coup June 24 2010, Julia Gillard took over as Prime Minister from Kevin Rudd and became Australia's first female PM.

Gillard is the first PM to be unmarried and a lesbian. (She is in a relationship with Tim Mathieson - who is a "beard.") She is the first PM to be sworn in without making reference to God. (Gillard is an atheist and has no religious beliefs.)

A reader has suggested that Gillard is head of the Satanic Alpha lodge of Sydney ("Australia`s global satanic legacy and future.")

This is based on the posthumous confessions of a leading Australian Satanist "Frater 616":

"Some of the deadliest, most effective and disarming assassins are women. Within the Alpha Lodges they are worshipped as embodiments of the Dark Goddess - who is known by many names and is virgin still! Currently the Outer Head of the Alpha Lodge Australasia is a very highly placed and successful Federal politician - whose Satanic name is Bestia."

We asked Aloysius Fozdyke, (the man who brought Frater 616's testimony to the world,) to comment. He is a member of the Alpha Lodge and we assume acts with their authorization.

His reply on the "Bestia"-Gillard connection: " I'd rather not comment at this stage."

Our reader continues, "there is only one female politician in Australia who fits "Frater 616"`s allusions to a "t"; and that person is Julia Gillard."

He says, "a closer study of photos of Julia Gillard (as well as ... European High Commissioner Herman van Rompuy, btw) clearly point to psycho-pathological traits - in Ms Gillard`s case those of the sadistic personality type. I would therefore venture the claim that Ms. Gillard is not only "a communist lesbian", but that she is in fact the head of the Satanic Alpha lodge - the "Bestia" mentioned by Frater 616; and the very person whose predilection is ritual child abuse."

Our reader continues:"In the same manner as Mr. van Rompuy has been placed at the very epicentre of European power (by his handlers Brzezinski and Kissinger; who "just happened to dine with him" in Belgium, on the very night of his election in November 2009.)"

"Ms. Gillard has now been placed in control of the south-east Asian region, quite possibly in preparation for the soon-to-be implementation of specific "new rules of societal conduct"...to be dictated by these very circles."

"Please also note these further clues: 1) Ms. Gillard is childless; although she obviously "enjoys" (as previous minister of education) concerning herself with children, she does not (as stated in an ABC interview of 2009) "especially like them".

"2) Ms. Gillard is "an atheist". Oh really? this might not be wholly dishonest, but actually a half-truth: if Ms. Gillard`s master is Satan ("the lord of this world"), as I would suggest, then she is -true to her beliefs- simply "hiding" this fact "in plain sight", as Satanists are wont to do.

"3) Ms. Gillard came to power very suddenly and in a most conniving "unusual" fashion; this would seem to point to hidden strings being pulled; strings such as those found in secret societies and brought to bear at the crucial time - and with deadly force. Further "enjoyment" is then drawn from the distress and shock of the opponent; in our case from the tearful downfall of Kevin Rudd (who would seem as decent a human being as they come, in the guise of politicians anyway.)

4) Ms Gillard is currently the only "highly placed and successful federal (female) politician"...her curriculum vitae, her views, as well as her highly suspect private life and "preferences" fit Frater 616`s description perfectly. all said, I`m sure that by following this admittedly still rather basic line of enquiry, others (perhaps more at home in Australian politics) will be able to add further evidence to my thesis.

In conclusion, the thesis that Gillard is the Head of an important Satanic Lodge is consistent with the claims made by both Frater 616 and Fozdyke that leading members of society, especially politicians, are Satanists. The fact that Fozdyke declines to comment is significant.

Here is the rest of the original article by "Matt" on Gillard. She certainly fits the profile in light of the occult and satanic roots of Communism and Lesbianism:

She was sworn in by Australia's first female Governor General (Quentin Bryce.) Bryce has held numerous high offices with the aim of advancing women's and "minority" rights at the expense of the Australia's European majority. Bryce's daughter is married to Bill Shorten who was pivotal in binging Gillard into the office of PM.

When she was at high school, Gillard was mentored by the Jewish liberal (i.e. Communist) Marlene Pilowski. When she moved to Melbourne to attend university, she became the Education Vice President of the left wing (i.e. Communist) AUS (Australian Union of Students), and later was its President.

Gillard was in the Socialist Forum from her university days. The forum's objectives were to create a socialist / feminist society through Labor governments. It originally consisted of ex-members of the Victorian branch of the Communist Party and some ALP members. Gillard was one of the two original paid organizers of the Forum. She wrote numerous documents for the Socialist Forum including 'Being a Socialist Teacher' and 'Future Directions of the Left'. It was also through the Forum that she met Labor heavy-weight Joan Kirner and worked closely with her on Labor's Affirmative Action Plan. Gillard wrote the constitution for the pro-abortion feminist organization EMILY's List (in Australia), which supports "progressive" Labor women.

In 2006, when in opposition, Gillard voted for legalizing the abortion pill RU486 and for stem cell research, which both became law. In March 2010, when she was Education Minister, Senator Ron Boswell said that "Julia Gillard's new [education] curriculum reads like a learners manual for international socialism".

As PM, Gillard has tried to assuage Australians by painting herself as a moderate. She has also distanced herself from Rudd, who had become the fall-guy for a bad government. Gillard however should take more blame as she was one of the "gang of 4" that made the decisions. She was directly behind the Building Education Revolution (BER) scandal over building unneeded overpriced schhools.

In less than three years, the Labor Government has gone from a 20 billion dollar surplus (left by Howard) to 148 billion debt, and is borrowing an extra $150 million every day. The common theme in Federal and state politics is that Labor governments create massive debt, and the Conservatives (Liberal / National party governments) pay that debt off. The main point though is missed - governments shouldn't be borrowing or repaying money from off-shore lenders in the first place.

Before holding the next general election (probably this year), Gillard wll have to straighten out 3 key policy areas. She compromised on the mining tax, which was originally introduced by Rudd to pay off debt. With her dodgy projection figures, she claimed it would bring the budget back into the black, but this is unlikely.

The second issue, that of the "boat people". Boat arrivals have increased at over 50 times the rate under Howard because of Rudd's loose regulations. Boat people are considered queue jumpers. Gillard said that they will be processed in East Timor although there is no centre there. She is ignoring the centre already built at Nauru. Gusmao, the PM of East Timor claims he wasn't consulted and didn't want a centre in his country.

The third issue is the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS.) Rudd initially pushed it hard, but it was defeated in the Senate. The average Australian didn't really understand what it was, but many have since woken up that it is essentially a big expense which will effect ordinary people. The ETS is not about saving the environment so much as social change and the redistribution of wealth.

Gillard who has painted herself to be a bit of a non-scary moderate, is red at the centre. The media distracts and woos the dumb masses with news about about her latest haircuts, etc (her gay boyfriend Mathieson is a hairdresser.) It is her aim however to re-engineer society, but years of the Left's influence in Labor governments, education and the media has already done that.

As PM, Gillard just looks like another version of Rudd. Pretending to listen to the people, she instead pushes the NWO agenda. Being a non-religious 50 year old woman in a de-facto relationship is nothing unusual in Australia anymore. Gillard simply mirrors what Australia already is, while helping to push it ever closer to extinction in the name of "tolerance."
http://www.henrymakow.com/new_aussie_pm_is_communist_les.html

AUSTRALIA SHOULD SUPPORT EFFORTS FOR A GLOBAL PARLIAMENT: GREEN PARTY LEADER

Canberra

30 June 2011

In a speech at the National Press Club on Wednesday, the leader of the Australian Greens, Senator Bob Brown, voiced support for the creation of a global parliament. As the Greens control the balance of power in the Australian Senate, the Green’s position will

Senator Bob Brown

Image: Australian Greens

potentially impact on government policy.

“The Howard government backed George W Bush's invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan in the cause of democracy”, Senator Brown said, “so why shouldn’t we now join vigorous moves in Europe and at the United Nations for a global people’s assembly based on one person, one vote, one value?” Such a global parliament, that according to Senator Brown “could be right here in Australia”, “would tackle international questions like nuclear proliferation, currency speculation, marine ecosystem destruction and those billion people who could be fed and literate if only a tenth of global military spending was sent to their assistance.”

Replying to a journalist’s question, Senator Brown remarked that the issue was “conceptual” at the moment. Global governance based on a representative global parliament will not occur in his lifetime, Senator Brown commented. He argued, however, ''why should Australia not be at the centre of what is inevitably going to be a global parliamentary governance down the line - if we human beings are going to live with each other on this marvellous planet of ours as we go on our joy ride of the future? Of course we are going to have make consensus decisions.''

Speech at the National Press Club at Youtube. Comments on global parliament at 10:30 and 40:30.

A UN Parliamentary Assembly

The Secretary-General of the international Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly that is based in Berlin, Germany, Andreas Bummel, commented that a UN Parliamentary Assembly would be a first pragmatic step towards the vision of a global parliament. “Setting up a parliamentary assembly at the UN in principle would be possible within only a few years of preparation”, Mr. Bummel said.

“It’s not a pie-in-the-sky fantasy. There’s extensive experience at the regional level that we can draw upon. For instance, there is the European Parliament, the Pan-African Parliament, the Mercosur Parliament and there is also the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe that includes 56 states and stretches from Vancouver to Vladivostok. Some of the scepticism that has been voiced in Australia might be rooted in Australia’s lack of experience with such bodies”, he noted.

“We hope that Australia will join the efforts for a UN Parliamentary Assembly. Senator Brown’s move comes at the right time. Just recently, the European Parliament has called on the EU’s 27 foreign ministers to promote a UN Parliamentary Assembly at the next session of the UN General Assembly”, Mr. Bummel said.

Public support in Australia

An opinion poll conducted by GlobeScan in 2005 in 18 countries established that in Australia 56 percent of respondents were in favor of the idea of a “new UN Praliament”, while 35 percent opposed it. The question asked in that poll was, among others: "Please tell me if you favor or oppose the following proposal: Creating a new UN Parliament, made up of representatives directly elected by citizens, having powers equal to the current UN General Assembly that is controlled by national governments."

Top image: Senator Bob Brown during a press conference in March 2011, Source: Australian Greens

http://en.unpacampaign.org/news/567.php

See also:

Coverage in The Age, June 30, 2011

WOE IN WOLLONGONG AS MINING CITY PREPARES FOR AUSTRALIA'S NEW CARBON TAX

City of coal and steel exemplifies hostility to a pollution levy, which has made prime minister Julia Gillard very unpopular

• Alison Rourke in Wollongong guardian.co.uk, Monday 4 July 2011


Protesters hold placards during a rally in Sydney against prime minister Julia Gillard's plans to introduce a carbon tax. Photograph: Greg Wood/AFP/Getty Images

Locals call this city "carbon central". But in the polarised Australian climate change debate, this mining hub is not central at all, but firmly positioned at one extreme.

Wollongong, 50 miles south of Sydney in New South Wales, is home to 300,000 people and millions of tonnes of coal.

The steep hills around Wollongong afford views of endless queues of ships on the watery horizon, waiting for their cargo of black gold. Coal has been the lifeblood of the city for 150 years and the backbone of its steel industry.

Regardless of the climate extremes, the droughts, wildfires, cyclones and floods that are ravaging Australia, locals do not want to give it up.

"It's all right for greenies to say this carbon tax has to happen, but we can't all hug trees for a living," said Brett Withers, who has worked as an industrial cleaning contractor in the steelworks for 20 years. "It might just be the straw that breaks the camel's back. If the tax comes in, this area will be devastated. It's not just the steel industry - it's the butcher, the hairdresser and the baker. Everyone will suffer."

Withers' remarks illustrate a furious backlash against imminent government plans to introduce a carbon tax. Labor prime minister Julia Gillard plans to announce the level of tax to be levied on pollution on Sunday 10 July.

The levy was proposed by Gillard, who needed support from Greens in a hung parliament. But the plan has divided Australia like no other issue of recent years.

An opinion poll on Tuesday 28 June showed Gillard's disapproval rating at 62%. Another poll suggested barely one in four Australians would vote for her, making her government the most unpopular in 40 years.

Cities such as Wollongong have led the assault, as blue collar voters - who have done well on the back of the mining boom - desert the prime minister in droves.

Australia is the world's largest producer of iron ore and coal, much of it bound for China's hungry construction industry. As commodity prices have skyrocketed, so have profits.

Australia's commodity export earnings are expected to rise 18% to a record $270bn (£180bn) in the next year. It is an industry that sustains a lot of livelihoods, and a lot of voters.

"If the polls as they stand now persist, then Labor will suffer a landslide thrashing in two years' time," said Nick Economou, senior lecturer in politics at Melbourne's Monash University. "They're in terrible, terrible trouble."

Gillard is not the first Australian leader to be unsettled by the climate and carbon debate. Her predecessor, Kevin Rudd, dropped his planned emissions trading scheme after failing to get it through parliament. It was the beginning of the end of his tenure.

In last year's election campaign, Gillard promised there would be no carbon tax if she was elected. But then came the hung parliament, with a majority of just one. With her political survival suddenly based on support from the Greens, she quickly changed her mind.

"You're really going to test the credulity of the electorate if you say one thing on a carbon tax and then do another," said Economou.

Post-election, Gillard set up a multi-party committee to hammer out details of the carbon tax. The scheme will start with a government-fixed price on carbon, moving to a market-set price after three years. The committee is expected to finalise the details of the tax within days but negotiations have dragged on for months, further damaging the government's credibility.

Over the weekend, Gillard announced that petrol would not be included in the tax but there is still no certainty on what the price of carbon will be under the scheme, which industries will be in or out and, crucially, what the compensation to households will be.

Gillard's standing has taken a battering and many voters have stopped listening to her.

The conservative opposition - led by climate sceptic, Tony Abbott, who once described human-induced climate change as "crap" - has capitalised on the uncertainty and on Gillard's flip-flop.

His slogan about a "great big new tax on everything" has been drilled home, along with the message that a carbon tax will hurt ordinary Australians.

His party has proposed "direct action" to meet the bipartisan agreed target of reducing CO² emissions by 5% by 2020 (based on 1990 levels). Abbott's voluntary scheme includes, among other things, planting 20m trees.

Rightwing shock jocks have also rammed home the anti-tax message, arguing that whatever Australia does will make little difference to the world's climate.

They have called Gillard "Ju-liar" and launched scathing personal attacks on senior government advisers on climate change as well as scientists. Some have even been subjected to death threats.

The growing number of climate change deniers put recent events like this year's devastating floods in Queensland and the most powerful cyclone in Australia's history (cyclone Yasi in February 2011 was as powerful as hurricane Katrina) down to freaks of nature rather than climate change.

From his inner city veggie patch stocked with lettuce, beetroot and cabbage, Sydney resident Greg Bearup despairs at the government's handling of the carbon tax debate. "I just can't see how we went from 60-70% support for action on climate change to a position where Gillard looks like she could lose her job over it," he said. "It's unbelievable it could have been handled so badly."

Bearup's street is just 15 minutes from the centre of the city, but a world away from the glistening blue of the harbour. The area has been gentrified but remains a concrete jungle with first world war era houses.

Two years ago Bearup and his neighbours dug up the concrete in front of their homes and planted gardens. He says the concrete was acting as a heat bank. Removing it has lowered the temperature in the summer, reducing the need for air conditioning.

He said a carbon tax will make sure heavy polluting industries like mining pay their fair share for the damage they are causing to the environment. "Everyone should be making an individual contribution to tackling climate change," he said.

• guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011