July 16, 2012.
From: http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics/
American eugenics refers inter alia to compulsory sterilization laws adopted by over 30 states that led to more than 60,000 sterilizations of disabled individuals. Many of these individuals were sterilized because of a disability: they were mentally disabled or ill, or belonged to socially disadvantaged groups living on the margins of society. American eugenic laws and practices implemented in the first decades of the twentieth century influenced the much larger National Socialist compulsory sterilization program, which between 1934 and 1945 led to approximately 350,000 compulsory sterilizations and was a stepping stone to the Holocaust. Even after the details of the Nazi sterilization program (as well as its role as a precursor to the "Euthanasia" murders) became more widely known after World War II (and which the New York Times had reported on extensively and in great detail even before its implementation in 1934), sterilizations in some American states did not stop. Some states continued to sterilize residents into the 1970s.
While
Germany has taken important steps to commemorate the horrors of its
past, including compulsory sterilization (however belatedly), the United
States arguably has not when it comes to eugenics. For some states,
there still is a paucity of reliable studies that show how and where
sterilizations occurred. Hospitals, asylums, and other places where
sterilizations were performed have so far typically chosen not to
document that aspect of their history. Moreover, until now there has
never been a website providing an easily accessible overview of American
eugenics for all American states.
This site provides such an overview. For each state for which information is available (see below), there is a short account of the number of victims (based on a variety of data sources), the known period during which sterilizations occurred, the temporal pattern of sterilizations and rate of sterilization, the passage of law(s), groups indentified in the law, the prescribed process of the law, precipitating factors and processes that led up a state’s sterilization program, the groups targeted and victimized, other restrictions placed on those identified in the law or with disabilities in general, major proponents of state eugenic sterilization, “feeder institutions” and institutions where sterilizations were performed, and opposition to sterilization. A short bibliography is also provided.
While
this research project was initially intended to give short accounts for
each state, it quickly moved beyond this goal. For those states for
which detailed monograph-length studies are availabe, it merely
summarizes existing scholarship, but for other states for which such
information is not readily available, it establishes the core parameters
within which a state's eugenic sterilizations were carried out. As part
of this research the current state of the facilities where
sterilizations occurred or that served as feeder institutions is
addressed.
This research brought into relief one
particular piece of information that might not be known even to the
specialists in the field. In Nazi Germany, during the peak years of
sterilization between 1934 and 1939, approximately 75-80 sterilizations
occurred per year per 100,000 residents. In Delaware, during the peak
period of sterilizations (late 1920s to late 1930s), the rate was 18,
about one fourth to one fifth of Germany's during its peak period, or
half of Bavaria’s in 1936.[1]
While the difference in the sterilization rate for a totalitarian
regime with a federal sterilization law soon to commit mass murder on a
historically unprecedented scale and a democratically governed state in a
democratic nation remains significant,[2] it is much smaller than one might perhaps expect.
Contributions to this project were made by sophomore honors students at the University of Vermont
as part of an Honors College course on Disability as Deviance. These
students wrote up the primary accounts, which were then edited and
amended by Lutz Kaelber, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Vermont,
who is solely responsible for its contents and any errors or omissions.
Research that went into this project was supported in parts by grants
of the College of Arts and Science’s Dean’s Office and the Center for
Teaching and Learning, and by funds of the University of Vermont's
Honors College.
Comments or questions? Email:
Link to "Eugenics" and Nazi "Euthanasia" Crimes gateway page.
Stories about this site and project: UVM Today, 03/04/2009; Honors College Newletter, 03/24/2009
____________________________________________
[1] Calculations based on available population figures. For Bavaria's number of sterilizations, see Max Spindler, Dieter Albrecht, and Alois Schmid, eds. 2003. Handbuch der bayerischen Geschichte. Munich: Beck, pp. 551-2. For additional comparison: The Canadian province of Alberta's rate was about 9 during its peak period of eugenic sterilizations between 1929 and 1939 (Grekul, Jana, Harvey Krahn, and Dave Odynak. 2004. "Sterilizing the 'Feeble-Minded': Eugenics in Alberta, 1929-1972." Journal of Historical Sociology 17, 4, p. 377).[2]Apart from its link to genodical policy, the Nazi sterilization policy remain unique insofar as "only here was compulsion applied so consistently; nowhere else a bureaucracy existed that was as comprehensive and efficient in its racial hygiene; and only here eugenics was theoretically and practically integrated into a centralized and institutionalized racial policy" (Michael Schwartz. 2008. " Eugenik und 'Euthanasie': Die internationale Debatte und Praxis bis 1933/45." In Tödliche Medizin im Nationalsozialismus: Von der Rassenhygiene zum Massenmord, ed. Klaus-Dietmar Henke. Cologne: Böhlau, p. 90).
No comments:
Post a Comment