WASHINGTON — Former Vice President Dick Cheney says in a new memoir that he urged President George W. Bush  to bomb a suspected Syrian nuclear reactor site in June 2007. But, he  wrote, Mr. Bush opted for a diplomatic approach after other advisers —  still stinging over “the bad intelligence we had received about Iraq’s  stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction” — expressed misgivings.         
“I again made the case for U.S. military action against the reactor,”  Mr. Cheney wrote about a meeting on the issue. “But I was a lone voice.  After I finished, the president asked, ‘Does anyone here agree with the  vice president?’ Not a single hand went up around the room.”        
Mr. Bush chose to try diplomatic pressure to force the Syrians to  abandon the secret program, but the Israelis bombed the site in  September 2007. Mr. Cheney’s account of the discussion appears in his  autobiography, “In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir,” which is  to be published by Simon & Schuster next week. A copy was obtained  by The New York Times.        
Mr. Cheney’s book — which is often pugnacious in tone and in which he  expresses little regret about many of the most controversial decisions  of the Bush administration — casts him as something of an outlier among  top advisers who increasingly took what he saw as a misguided course on  national security issues. While he praises Mr. Bush as “an outstanding  leader,” Mr. Cheney, who made guarding the secrecy of internal  deliberations a hallmark of his time in office, divulges a number of  conflicts with others in the inner circle.        
He wrote that George J. Tenet, the director of the Central Intelligence  Agency, resigned in 2004 just “when the going got tough,” a decision he  calls “unfair to the president.” He wrote that he believes that  Secretary of State Colin L. Powell tried to undermine President Bush by  privately expressing doubts about the Iraq war, and he confirms that he  pushed to have Mr. Powell removed from the cabinet after the 2004  election. “It was as though he thought the proper way to express his  views was by criticizing administration policy to people outside the  government,” Mr. Cheney writes. His resignation “was for the best.”         
He faults former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for naïveté in the efforts to forge a nuclear weapons  agreement with North Korea, and Mr. Cheney reports that he fought with  White House advisers over softening the president’s speeches on Iraq.         
Mr. Cheney acknowledged that the administration underestimated the  challenges in Iraq, but he said the real blame for the violence was with  the terrorists.        
He also defends the Bush administration’s decision to inflict what he called “tough interrogations” — like the suffocation technique known as waterboarding  — on captured terrorism suspects, saying it extracted information that  saved lives. He rejects portrayals of such techniques as “torture.”         
In discussing the much-disputed “16 words” about Iraq’s supposed hunt  for uranium in Niger that were included in President Bush’s 2003 State of the Union address  to help justify the eventual invasion, Mr. Cheney said that unlike  other aides, he saw no need to apologize for making that claim. He  writes that Ms. Rice eventually came around to his view.        
“She came into my office, sat down in the chair next to my desk and tearfully admitted I had been right,” he wrote.        
The book opens with an account of Mr. Cheney’s experiences during the  terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when he essentially commanded the  government’s response from a bunker beneath the White House while Mr.  Bush — who was away from Washington and hampered by communications  breakdowns — played a peripheral role. But Mr. Cheney wrote that he did  not want to make any formal statement to the nation that day.        
“My past government experience,” he wrote, “had prepared me to manage  the crisis during those first few hours on 9/11, but I knew that if I  went out and spoke to the press, it would undermine the president, and  that would be bad for him and for the country.        
“We were at war. Our commander in chief needed to be seen as in charge, strong, and resolute — as George W. Bush was.”        
Mr. Cheney appears to relish much of the criticism heaped on him by  liberals, but reveals that he had offered to resign several times as  President Bush prepared for his re-election in 2004 because he was  afraid of becoming a burden on the Republican ticket. After a few days,  however, Mr. Cheney said that Mr. Bush said he wanted him to stay.         
But in the Bush administration’s second term, Mr. Cheney’s influence  waned. When Mr. Bush decided to replace Donald H. Rumsfeld as secretary  of defense after the 2006 midterm elections, Mr. Cheney said he was not  given a chance to object.        
Mr. Cheney praised Barack Obama’s support, as a senator from Illinois,  for passing a bank bailout bill at the height of the financial crisis,  shortly before the 2008 election. But he criticizes Mr. Obama’s decision  to withdraw the 33,000 additional troops he sent to Afghanistan in 2009  by September 2012, and writes that he has been “happy to note” that Mr.  Obama has failed to close the prison in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, as he had  pledged.        
Mr. Cheney’s long struggle with heart disease is a recurring theme in  the book. He discloses that he wrote a letter of resignation, dated  March 28, 2001, and told an aide to give it to Mr. Bush if he ever had a  heart attack or stroke that left him incapacitated.        
And in the epilogue, Mr. Cheney writes that after undergoing heart  surgery in 2010, he was unconscious for weeks. During that period, he  wrote, he had a prolonged, vivid dream that he was living in an Italian  villa, pacing the stone paths to get coffee and newspapers.        
No comments:
Post a Comment