-->

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

WHAT ARE THE ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF RADIATION EXPOSURE? WHY IS THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE MINIMIZNG THIS URGENT QUESTION?

Never forget Chernobyl

It's time to say NO to nuclear energy.

Copyright 2011-3011 Alternative News Forum, All Rights Reserved.

Re-posted on 3.16.2011 Courtesy of the BBC website at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12722435

As American families scramble to procure potassium iodide tablets and to learn all they can about the health effects of radiation exposure, I have been at first baffled, and eventually irate over the lack of intelligent truthful and accurate reporting on this issue from the mainstream press. Scouring the web daily for good and helpful easy to read and understand articles on the topic of radiation exposure, I have noted with alarm and dismay that our US news media is putting out a steady stream of conflicting, confusing, incomplete and misleading articles on this topic.

‘Be prepared’: U.S. Surgeon General’s warning as terrified Americans panic-buy anti-radiation drugs and Geiger counters over nuclear fall-out fears

Cited:

  • Nukepills.com sells 250,000 potassium iodide pills while Anbex gets three orders a MINUTE instead of per week
  • Packs of 14 pills that usually cost $9.99 changing hands on Amazon.com and eBay for $250 to $400
  • Geigercounters.com begs people not to place any more orders after it sells out of radiation detection gadgets
  • Real-time radiation map of U.S. shows levels are currently within normal ranges
  • Japan Fukushima plant rocked by another fire and two more explosions, bringing the total to four
  • President Obama: ‘No danger of Japan nuclear fallout reaching the U.S.’ [ Are you KIDDING me? How WRONG is this statement! ]
  • American media outlets, elected local officials, Barack Obama: Get your story straight!

    As the Los Angeles County health official was just quoted as saying that iodine pills are not needed, the US Surgeon General was quoted the same day saying just the opposite. To make matters worse our own clearly incompetent and clueless Commander-in-Chief chimed in with the L.A. officials’ remarks, reiterating that “no nuclear fallout would reach the U.S”. Since when is Barack Obama a soothsayer on the nuances of the pacific jet stream? It’s an ill-informed misstatement at least, and an overt blunder at worst to just assume that “no radioactive fallout will reach this country.” How absurd for him to make such an ill informed comment at this particular time. It does nothing to bolster the people’s flagging faith in this man leadership, which is always suspiciously missing in action when needed.

    It’s just one more WTF moment in observing the apparent incompetence of elected US public high officials in dealing adequately with a very serious potential national health crisis that is unfolding hourly. Minimizing the imminent threat of radiation clouds that could blow over the USA mainland and even stall over certain regions seems more than a little bit wicked to me.

    What in the hell is our local and national leadership thinking at this urgent moment? Are local public officials actually trying to convince Americans NOT to look at the potential nuclear fallout elephant in the living room? For God’s sake, why?

    No one in their right mind, as far as I am concerned, should be telling Americans NOT to procure supplies of potassium iodide tablets, yet that is exactly what one Los Angeles County public health official was just quoted as saying. Honestly, were it not for the UK, Canadian and Australian press, I would be hard pressed to locate good educational materials on the topic of radiation exposure at all.

    Why are our health and public safety leaders sticking their heads in the sand at this particular moment, when serious and strenuous national leadership and a unified health and safety message for the American public is so desperately needed?

    I’d like to thank the BBC, Australian and Canadian press for their helpful essays and reporting on both the nuclear events in Japan as they occurred, and the possible adverse health effects of exposure to airborne radiation. I could not locate a single article like this one below in the US press. What’s wrong with that picture?

    Chase Kyla Hunter

    Cited:

    What are the immediate health effects of exposure to radiation?

    Exposure to moderate levels of radiation – above one gray – can result in radiation sickness, which produces a range of symptoms.

    Nausea and vomiting often begin within hours of exposure, followed by diarrhoea, headaches and fever.

    After the first round of symptoms, there may be a brief period with no apparent illness, but this may be followed within weeks by new, more serious symptoms.

    At higher levels of radiation, all of these symptoms may be immediately apparent, along with widespread – and potentially fatal – damage to internal organs.

    Exposure to a radiation dose of four gray will typically kill about half of all healthy adults.

    For comparison, radiation therapy for cancer typically involves several doses of between one and seven gray at a time – but these doses are highly controlled, and usually specifically targeted at small areas of the body.

    Radiation dose Effect
    Source: World Nuclear Association: See http://worldnuclear.org/auswahl.cfm?select=1
    2 mSv/yr (millisieverts per year) Typical background radiation experienced by everyone (average 1.5 mSv in Australia, 3 mSv in North America)
    9 mSv/yr Exposure by airline crew flying New York-Tokyo polar route
    20 mSv/yr Current limit (averaged) for nuclear industry employees
    50 mSv/yr Former routine limit for nuclear industry employees. It is also the dose rate which arises from natural background levels in several places in Iran, India and Europe
    100 mSv/yr Lowest level at which any increase in cancer is clearly evident.
    350 mSv/lifetime Criterion for relocating people after Chernobyl accident
    1,000 mSv single dose Causes (temporary) radiation sickness such as nausea and decreased white blood cell count, but not death. Above this, severity of illness increases with dose
    5,000 mSv single dose Would kill about half those receiving it within a month

    How is radiation sickness treated?

    The first thing to do is to try to minimise further contamination by removing clothes and shoes, and gently washing the skin with soap and water.

    Drugs are available that increase white blood-cell production to counter any damage that may have occurred to the bone marrow, and to reduce the risk of further infections due to immune-system damage.

    There are also specific drugs that can help to reduce the damage to internal organs caused by radioactive particles.

    How does radiation have an impact on health?

    Radioactive materials that decay spontaneously produce ionising radiation, which has the capacity to cause significant damage to the body’s internal chemistry, breaking the chemical bonds between the atoms and molecules that make up our tissues.

    The body responds by trying to repair this damage, but sometimes it is too severe or widespread to make repair possible. There is also a danger of mistakes in the natural repair process.

    Regions of the body that are most vulnerable to radiation damage include the cells lining the intestine and stomach, and the blood-cell producing cells in the bone marrow.

    The extent of the damage caused is dependent on how long people are exposed to radiation, and at what level.

    Radiation and cancer

    • Most experts agree even small doses of ionising radiation – as low as 100 millisieverts – can increase the risk of cancer, but by a very small amount.
    • In general, the risk of cancer increases as the dose of radiation increases. Exposure to one sievert of radiation is estimated to increase the lifetime risk of fatal cancer by around 5%.
    • The thyroid gland and bone marrow are particularly sensitive to ionising radiation.
    • Leukemia, a type of cancer that arises in the bone marrow, is the most common radiation-induced cancer. Leukemias may appear as early as a few years after radiation exposure.
    • Other cancer can also result from exposure to radiation, but may not develop for at least a decade. These include cancers of the lung, skin, thyroid, breast and stomach.

    What are the most likely long-term health effects?

    Cancer is the biggest long-term risk. Usually when the body’s cells reach their “sell-by date” they commit suicide. Cancer results when cells lose this ability, and effectively become immortal, continuing to divide and divide in an uncontrolled fashion.

    The body has various processes for ensuring that cells do not become cancerous, and for replacing damaged tissue.

    But the damage caused by exposure to radiation can completely disrupt these control processes, making it much more likely that cancer will result.

    Failure to properly repair the damage caused by radiation can also result in changes – or mutations – to the body’s genetic material, which are not only associated with cancer, but may also be potentially passed down to offspring, leading to deformities in future generations. These can include smaller head or brain size, poorly formed eyes, slow growth and severe learning difficulties.

    Are children at greater risk?

    Potentially yes. Because they are growing more rapidly, more cells are dividing, and so the potential for things to go wrong is greater.

    Following the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident in the Ukraine in 1986, the World Health Organization recorded a dramatic increase in thyroid cancer among children in the vicinity.

    This was because the radioactive materials released during the accident contained high levels of radioactive iodine, a material that accumulates in the thyroid.

    What risk does Fukushima pose currently?

    The Japanese authorities have recorded a radiation level of up 400 millisieverts per hour at the nuclear plant itself.

    A sievert is essentially equivalent to a gray, but tends to be used to measure lower levels of radiation, and for assessing long-term risk, rather than the short-term acute impact of exposure.

    Professor Richard Wakeford, an expert in radiation exposure at the University of Manchester, said exposure to a dose of 400 millisieverts was unlikely to cause radiation sickness – that would require a dose of around twice that level (one sievert/one gray).

    However, it could start to depress the production of blood cells in the bone marrow, and was likely to raise the lifetime risk of fatal cancer by 2-4%. Typically, a Japanese person has a lifetime risk of fatal cancer of 20-25%.

    Prof Wakeford stressed only emergency workers at the plant were at risk of exposure to such a dose – but it was likely that they would only be exposed for short periods of time to minimise their risk.

    The level of exposure for the general population, even those living close to the plant, was unlikely to be anywhere near as high.

    How can the Japanese authorities minimise the cost to human health?

    Prof Wakeford said that provided the Japanese authorities acted quickly, most of the general population should be spared significant health problems.

    He said in those circumstances the only people likely to be at risk of serious health effects were nuclear workers at the plant or emergency workers exposed to high levels of radiation.

    He said the top priority would be to evacuate people from the area and to make sure they did not eat contaminated food. The biggest risk was that radioactive iodine could get into their system, raising the risk of thyroid cancer.

    To counter that risk, people – in particular children – could be given tablets containing stable iodine which would prevent the body absorbing the radioactive version.

    The Japanese already have a lot of iodine in their natural diet, so that should help too.

    How does Fukushima compare to Chernobyl?

    Professor Gerry Thomas, who has studied the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster, said: “It is very unlikely that this will turn into anything that resembles Chernobyl.

    “In Chernobyl you had a steam explosion which exposed the reactor core, which meant you had a lot of radiation shooting up into the atmosphere.”

    Prof Thomas said although the Chernobyl disaster had led to a rise in thyroid cancer cases, the only people affected were those living in the immediate area of the explosion and who were young at the time.

    Tuesday, March 15, 2011

    MAN WITH 4TH AMENDMENT WRITTEN ON CHEST SUES OVER AIRPORT ARREST

    By David Kravets March 14, 2011

    Government photo of Aaron Tobey being held at Richmond International Airport on December 30

    A 21-year-old Virginia man who wrote an abbreviated version of the Fourth Amendment on his body and stripped to his shorts at an airport security screening area is demanding $250,000 in damages for being detained on a disorderly conduct charge.

    Aaron Tobey claims in a civil rights lawsuit (.pdf) that in December he was handcuffed and held for about 90 minutes by the Transportation Security Administration at the Richmond International Airport after he began removing his clothing to display on his chest a magic-marker protest of airport security measures.

    “Amendment 4: The right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated,” his chest and gut read.

    The University of Cincinnati student didn’t want to go through the advanced imaging technology X-ray machines that are cropping up at airports nationwide. Instead, when it was his turn to be screened, he was going to opt for an intrusive pat-down — and remove most of his clothing in the process.

    “He went there knowing he would not do the advanced imaging and do the pat-down instead,” his attorney, James Knicely, said in a telephone interview. “He was making it easy for them and in the process he wanted to communicate his objection for doing so.”

    Among other things, the federal lawsuit claims wrongful detention and a breach of the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment. “He was held there for 90 minutes, and handcuffed behind his back,” Knicely said.

    Tobey was on his way to Wisconsin for his grandmother’s funeral. Despite his detainment, he made his flight.

    According to the suit, while under interrogation on December 30, the authorities wanted to know “about his affiliation with, or knowledge of, any terrorist organizations, if he had been asked to do what he did by any third party, and what his intentions and goals were.”

    Two weeks later, Henrico County prosecutors dropped the misdemeanor charge.

    Tuesday, March 8, 2011

    DIGGERS MESS UP IN MIDDLE EAST

    Ian McPhedran From: Herald Sun March 09, 2011

    DRINK-driving, drunk on duty, sleeping on the job and accidentally firing a gun are among the offences committed by Australian military personnel in the Middle East in the past two years.

    A total of 160 Australians from all three services faced 167 charges of misconduct in the Middle East Area of Operations between January 2009 and February this year.

    It reads like something from a training manual under the heading: "What not to do in a war zone".

    There were 14 cases of troops being AWOL, 15 instances of unauthorised weapon discharge and five where troops were drunk on duty.

    One person was charged with driving a service vehicle while intoxicated.

    The offenders include 35 officers.

    The figures do not include three commandos who have been charged with manslaughter over the death of five children during a special forces raid in 2009. That case is due in court within weeks.

    "Misdemeanors" were not included in the figures. These include matters that were overlooked or downgraded to a warning and "counselling".

    The most common charge involved 65 service personnel who failed to comply with a general order.

    Such orders cover issues such as dress codes and appearance.

    The next most common, but much more serious, offence was disobeying a lawful order -- committed by 27 Australians. Punishment varies from a reprimand to loss of pay and rank.

    The most serious cases can result in jail time in the defence force correctional establishment.

    Charges are usually heard by a superior officer who can refer them up the command chain.

    During the two-year period about 10,000 Australian Defence Force personnel have served in the Middle East, including Afghanistan, navy ships at sea and other bases across the region.

    Others charges included prejudicial conduct (16 charged), insubordinate conduct (six), insubordinate language (two), dangerous conduct (two), destruction of service property (two), asleep on guard duty (one), and creating a disturbance (one).

    NASA Scientist Dr Richard Hoover claims to have found evidence of alien life

    NewsCore From: NewsCore March 06, 2011
    Alien life

    While some scientists are excited by the finds, others say more evidence is needed that we have found alien life. File picture Source: Supplied

    WE are not alone and alien life forms may have more in common with life on Earth than we had thought, according to a NASA scientist.

    The out-of-this-world research by Dr Richard B. Hoover, an astrobiologist with NASA's Marshall Space Flight Centre, was published in the March edition of the Journal of Cosmology.

    In the report, Dr Hoover describes the latest findings in his study of an extremely rare class of meteorites, called CI1 carbonaceous chondrites - only nine such meteorites were known to exist on Earth.

    The scientist was convinced that his findings revealed fossil evidence of bacterial life within such meteorites and by extension, suggests we are not alone in the universe.

    "I interpret it as indicating that life is more broadly distributed than restricted strictly to the planet Earth," Dr Hoover said.

    "This field of study has just barely been touched because quite frankly, a great many scientists would say that this is impossible."

    In what he called "a very simple process," Dr Hoover fractured the meteorite stones under a sterile environment before examining the freshly broken surface with the standard tools of the scientist: a scanning electron microscope and a field emission electron scanning microscope, which allowed him to search the stone's surface for evidence of fossil remains.

    He found the fossil remains of micro-organisms not so different from ordinary ones found underfoot on Earth.

    "The exciting thing is that they are in many cases recognisable and can be associated very closely with the generic species here on earth," Dr Hoover said.

    But not all of them. "There are some that are just very strange and don't look like anything that I've been able to identify, and I've shown them to many other experts that have also come up stumped."

    Other scientists say the implications of this research were shocking, describing the findings variously as profound, very important and extraordinary.

    But Dr David Marais, an astrobiologist with NASA's AMES Research Centre, said he was very cautious about jumping on the bandwagon.

    These kinds of claims have been made before, he noted and found to be false.

    "It's an extraordinary claim, and thus I'll need extraordinary evidence," he said.

    SUPERMARKET GIANT COLES ACCUSED OF HIKING PETROL PRICE TO PAY FOR CHEAP MILK

    Anne Wright From:Herald Sun March 09, 2011
    Petrol pump

    Coles is accused of hiking petrol prices to cover the cost of cheap milk. Picture: Adam Ward Source: Herald Sun

    COLES will be forced to answer whether it is conning customers by hiking up the cost of petrol to pay for slashed milk prices.

    The supermarket giant will be quizzed by a Senate committee about claims by a rival independent chain it may have lifted petrol rates to cover the cost of cutting the price of milk.

    Foodworks chief executive Russell Markham claimed in his submission to a Senate inquiry yesterday that Coles couldn't sell milk at cut prices without making up the lost income in other areas.

    Are shoppers being conned by supermarkets? Have your say below

    "I am aware that fuel can be offset against grocery prices and an ex-employee of Coles has told me that," he said.

    Coles hit back, saying there was no evidence for the claim.

    "We do not cross-subsidise between our supermarket and petrol businesses," spokesman Jim Cooper said.

    "All of our price cuts stand alone and are genuine. And we would note that our fuel prices are competitive within the fuel market, which they obviously would not be if they were being used to subsidise food prices."

    The price of petrol at Coles Express service stations in inner-Melbourne was up to 143.9c yesterday, according to petrol monitoring website MotorMouth.

    The Senate economics committee also heard fresh milk would become a luxury. Long-life milk would be used in the average Australian home if supermarket price wars went unchecked.

    Coles came under fire after dairy organisations said the industry would crumble if "unsustainably" low prices of milk were allowed to continue.

    Australian Dairy Farmers vice-president Christopher Griffin told the hearing Coles was "not to be trusted" after it slashed the cost of milk to $1 a litre.

    "It's simply not sustainable," he said.

    "Dairy farmers do not or should not trust Coles - and neither should its customers."

    Independent senator Nick Xenophon said outside the inquiry that Coles was showing contempt for the Senate, farmers and consumers by not making a submission explaining its actions.

    "Woolworths let the cat out of the bag last night when . . . they said that this price war is simply unsustainable, that it will have a huge impact on the dairy industry," he said.

    wrighta@heraldsun.com.au

    1995 CONTRACT BETWEEN CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA -A DELAWARE CORPORATION- AND FRENCH COMPANY SODEXHO S.A

    This was something I found on an old laptop. Hopefully it is useful.
    SHAREHOLDERS' AGREEMENT

    This Shareholders' Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of October
    17, 1995, is by and among Corrections Corporation of Australia Pty. Ltd., a
    Queensland, Australia corporation (the "Corporation"), Corrections Corporation
    of America, a Delaware corporation ("CCA") and Sodexho S.A., a French societe
    anonyme ("Sodexho") (CCA and Sodexho are sometimes referred to herein
    collectively as the "Shareholders").

    W I T N E S S E T H:

    WHEREAS, CCA owns 22,500 class "C" shares in the capital of the
    Corporation, representing in the aggregate one hundred percent (100%) of the
    issued and outstanding class "C" shares of the Corporation;

    WHEREAS, Sodexho owns 22,500 Class "C" Shares in the Capital of the
    Corporation which Shares are held in accordance with Section 3.02(a)(ii) of the
    Stock Purchase Agreement as amended on October 17, 1995 (the "Stock Purchase
    Agreement"); and

    WHEREAS, the parties believe it is in the best interest of the
    Corporation and its Shareholders to restrict Transfers of shares of capital of
    the Corporation, and desire to set forth the terms and conditions regarding any
    Transfers of class "C" shares and to set forth their agreements with respect to
    certain other matters.

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
    promises, covenants, representations, warranties, and conditions contained in
    this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
    sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Corporation and the
    Shareholders hereby agree as follows:

    1. Definitions.

    The following words and terms when used in this Agreement shall have
    the meanings set forth below.

    (a) "Affiliate" means any person or entity that, directly or
    indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or
    is under common control with, the person or entity specified.

    (b) "Holder" or "Holders" means one or more Holders of Class
    "C" Shares in the Capital of the Corporation, whether legal or beneficial
    Holders, or parties to this Agreement or who are otherwise bound by its terms.

    (c) "Shares" means all Class "C" Shares in the capital of the
    Corporation held by the Holders and all other securities of the Corporation or
    any successor of the Corporation which (i) may be issued in exchange for or in
    respect of such Shares (whether by way of stock split,
    2



    stock dividend, combination, reclassification, share exchange, reorganization,
    exchange, conversion, or any other means), or (ii) may be hereafter acquired by
    any Holder or during the term of this Agreement.


    (d) "Transfer", "Transferred", or "Transferring" means any
    sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, pledge, hypothecation, mortgage,
    encumbrance, gift, or other disposition of any Shares or any interest therein,
    whether direct or indirect, or any attempted sale, assignment, transfer,
    conveyance, pledge, hypothecation, mortgage, encumbrance, or other disposition
    of such Shares or interest, including, without limitation, any commitment or
    executory contract relating to the foregoing which is not expressly subject to
    this Agreement.

    2. Conditions to Transfer.

    No Holder shall Transfer all or any part of its Shares, except
    expressly in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

    3. Right of First Refusal on Dispositions by Shareholders. No
    Shareholder shall directly or indirectly Transfer any or all Shares owned by it
    to a third party unless (a) such Shareholder shall have received a bona-fide
    arm's length offer to purchase such Shares from such third party, and (b) the
    Shareholder first submits a written offer (the "Offer") to the other
    Shareholder (the "Remaining Shareholder") identifying the third party to whom
    such Shares are proposed to be sold and the terms of the proposed sale and
    offering the opportunity to purchase such Shares on terms and conditions,
    including price, not less favorable to the Remaining Shareholder or its
    designee than those on which the Shareholder proposes to sell such Shares to
    any other purchaser.

    The Remaining Shareholder shall act upon the Offer as soon as
    practicable after receipt thereof, and in any event within 20 days after
    receipt thereof. In the event that the Remaining Shareholder or its designee
    shall elect to purchase all or a part of the Shares covered by the Offer, the
    Remaining Shareholder shall communicate in writing such election to purchase to
    the Shareholder who submitted the Offer, which communication shall be delivered
    to such Shareholder as set forth in Section 16 hereof and shall, when taken in
    conjunction with the Offer, be deemed to constitute a valid, legally binding
    and enforceable agreement for the sale and purchase of the Shares covered
    thereby.

    In the event that the Remaining Shareholder or its designee does not
    purchase all of the Shares offered by such Shareholder pursuant to the Offer,
    the unpurchased portion of such Shares may be sold by such Shareholder at any
    time within ninety (90) days after receipt of the Offer by the Remaining
    Shareholder. Any such sale shall be to the person originally named in the
    Offer as the proposed purchaser or transferee and shall be at not less than the
    price and upon other terms and conditions, if any, not more favorable to such
    purchaser than those specified in the Offer. Any Shares proposed to be sold
    after such ninety (90) day period, to a different


    2
    3

    purchaser or at a lower price or otherwise on more favorable terms shall be
    subject to the requirements of a prior offer to the Remaining Shareholder
    pursuant to this Section 3.

    If the purchase price specified in the Offer includes any property
    other than cash, such purchase price shall be deemed to be the amount of any
    cash included in the purchase price plus the value (as determined in good faith
    by the Corporation's regular investment banking firm) of such other property
    included in such price. If the Remaining Shareholder exercises its right of
    first refusal hereunder, the closing of the purchase of the Shares with respect
    to which such right has been exercised shall take place within thirty (30)
    calendar days (or if approval of such purchase by the Corporation's
    shareholders is required by law or pursuant to any stock exchange rule or
    policy, within ninety (90) calendar days) after the Remaining Shareholder gives
    notice of such exercise. Upon exercise of its right of first refusal, the
    Remaining Shareholder shall be legally obligated to consummate the purchase
    contemplated thereby and shall use its best efforts to secure all approvals
    required in connection therewith.

    4. Right to Participate in Transfers.

    (a) If at any time any Remaining Shareholder receives an
    Offer pursuant to Section 3 hereof and does not elect to exercise the right of
    first refusal granted in Section 3 with respect to such Offer, such Remaining
    Shareholder may elect to Transfer a Pro Rata Share, as hereinafter defined, of
    the securities described in such Offer. As used in this Section 4, "Pro Rata
    Share" means the product of the number of Shares in the Offer and a fraction
    (i) the numerator of which is the number of Shares held by such Remaining
    Shareholder, and (ii) the denominator of which is the sum of the number of
    Shares held by all Remaining Shareholders who choose to exercise the rights
    granted in this Section 4, plus the number of Shares held by the Holder making
    the Offer.

    (b) Each Remaining Shareholder wishing so to participate in
    any Transfer under this Section 4 shall notify the Holder making the Offer in
    writing of such intention as soon as practicable after such Remaining
    Shareholder's receipt of the Offer pursuant to Section 3, and in any event
    within thirty (30) days after the date of the Offer. Such notification shall
    be delivered or mailed to such Holder in accordance with Section 15 below.

    (c) The Holder and each Remaining Shareholder participating
    in the proposed Transfer pursuant to this Section 4 shall Transfer to the
    proposed transferee (the "Proposed Transferee") (and any Remaining Shareholders
    exercising rights of first refusal pursuant to Section 3 hereof) all, or, at
    the option of the Proposed Transferee (or any such Remaining Shareholder) any
    part of Shares in the Offer (the "Offered Shares") proposed to be Transferred
    at not less than the price and upon other terms and conditions, if any, not
    more favorable to the Proposed Transferee (or any such Remaining Shareholder)
    than those in the Offer provided by the Holder under Section 3 hereof;
    provided, however, that any purchase or other acquisition of less than all of
    such Offered Shares by the Proposed Transferee (and any Remaining Shareholders
    exercising rights of first refusal pursuant to Section 3 hereof) shall be made
    from the Holder and each participating Remaining Shareholder pro rata based
    upon the relative amount of the Offered





    3
    4

    Shares that the Holder and such participating Remaining Shareholder is
    otherwise entitled to Transfer pursuant to Section 4(a).

    (d) The Remaining Shareholders' right to participate in a
    Transfer pursuant to this Section 4 shall not apply with respect to Transfers
    of Shares to the Corporation.

    5. Right of First Refusal to Purchase New Securities.

    (a) The Corporation shall, prior to any issuance by the
    Corporation of any of its securities (other than debt securities with no equity
    feature), offer to each Holder owning at least ten percent (10%) of the issued
    and outstanding class "C" shares of the Corporation by written notice the
    right, for a period of thirty (30) days, to purchase its Pro Rata Amount, as
    hereinafter defined, of such securities for cash at a per share amount equal to
    the per share price or other consideration for which such securities (the "New
    Securities") are to be issued. For purposes of this Section 5, "Pro Rata
    Amount" means the product of the New Securities to be issued and a fraction (i)
    the numerator of which is the number of Shares held by such Holder as of the
    date of the New Securities Notice, as hereinafter defined, and (ii) the
    denominator of which is the aggregate number of Shares held on such date by all
    Holders of Shares. The first refusal rights of the Holders pursuant to this
    Section 5 shall not apply to securities issued (i) as a stock dividend or upon
    any subdivision of Shares, provided that the securities issued are limited to
    additional Shares, or (ii) pursuant to the exercise of options to purchase
    shares of capital stock granted to employees of the Corporation, not to exceed
    in the aggregate ten percent (10%) of capital shares outstanding (appropriately
    adjusted in each case to reflect stock splits, stock dividends, share
    exchanges, combinations of shares, and the like with respect to the Shares).
    The Corporation's written notice to the Shareholders (the "New Securities
    Notice") shall describe in reasonable detail the securities proposed to be
    issued by the Corporation and specify the number, price, and the terms of
    payment, and shall be deemed to be dated the date it is given to the
    Shareholders in accordance with Section 16 hereof.

    (b) Each Shareholder may accept the Corporation's offer as to
    the full number of New Securities offered to it in the New Securities Notice or
    as to any lesser number, by written notice thereof ("Notice of Acceptance")
    given by it to the Corporation prior to the expiration of the aforesaid thirty
    (30) day period. A Shareholder who accepts such offer as to any portion of its
    Pro Rata Amount of the New Securities shall be referred to herein as a
    Participating Shareholder. If any Participating Shareholder shall subscribe
    for less than his Pro Rata Amount of the New Securities, the other
    Participating Shareholders shall be entitled to purchase the balance of that
    Participating Shareholder's Pro Rata Amount of the New Securities in the same
    proportion in which they were entitled to purchase the New Securities pursuant
    to Section 5(a). Within five (5) days following the expiration of the
    aforesaid thirty (30) day period, the Corporation shall notify each
    Participating Shareholder of the amount of New Securities which each
    Participating Shareholder may purchase pursuant to the foregoing provision and
    each Participating Shareholder shall then have fifteen (15) days from the
    receipt of such notice to indicate such additional amount of New Securities, if
    any, that such Participating Shareholder wishes to purchase. Promptly
    thereafter, the Corporation shall sell and each Participating





    4
    5

    Shareholder shall buy, upon the terms specified, the number of New Securities
    agreed to be purchased by each Participating Shareholder.

    (c) The Corporation shall be free at any time prior to one
    hundred twenty (120) days after the date of its New Securities Notice to the
    Shareholder, to offer and sell to any third party or parties the number of such
    New Securities not agreed by the Shareholder to be purchased by them (the
    "Refused Securities"), at a price and on payment terms no less favorable to the
    Corporation than those specified in such New Securities Notice to the
    Shareholders. However, if such third party sale or sales are not consummated
    within such one hundred twenty (120) day period, the Corporation shall not sell
    such New Securities as shall not have been purchased within such period without
    again complying with this Section 5.

    (d) In the event the Corporation shall propose to sell less
    than all the Refused Securities (any such sale to be in the manner and on the
    terms specified in this Section 5), the Shareholders may, at their sole option
    and in their sole discretion, reduce the number of, or other units of
    calculation of the amount of, the New Securities specified in their respective
    Notices of Acceptance to an amount which shall be not less than the product of:
    (i) the ratio of the amount of New Securities in respect of which Notices of
    Acceptance were delivered to the Corporation to the total amount of New
    Securities specified in the New Securities Notice multiplied by (ii) the total
    amount of New Securities proposed to be actually sold by the Corporation
    (calculated without regard to this provision). In the event that the
    Shareholders so elect to reduce the number or amount of New Securities
    specified in their respective Notices of Acceptance, the number or amount of
    New Securities by which such New Securities specified in the Notices of
    Acceptance are reduced shall not be sold or otherwise disposed of until they
    have again been offered to the Purchasers in accordance with this Section 5.

    6. Permitted Transfers. Anything herein to the contrary
    notwithstanding, the provisions of Sections 2,3,4 and 5 shall not apply to any
    Transfer by a Shareholder to any Affiliate of such Shareholder. In the event
    of any such Transfer, the transferee of the Shares shall be bound by the terms
    and conditions of this Agreement, and shall, as a condition of such transfer,
    the transferee shall execute and deliver to the other Shareholder and the
    Corporation a written agreement to that effect.

    7. Call Option.

    (a) In the case of an Event of Default (as described below)
    by a Shareholder, the other Shareholder (the "Nondefaulting Shareholder") shall
    be granted the option to purchase the Shares held by the other Shareholder at a
    fair value price (the "Fair Price"), but in no case shall the Fair Price be
    less than the book value of such interest, to be determined by the
    Corporation's independent accountants (the "Accountant"). The costs of such
    Accountant shall be paid by the Corporation. Such option shall be exercisable
    for a period of 15 days following the delivery of the valuation report by the
    Accountant.





    5
    6

    (b) If the Non-Defaulting Shareholder has not exercised its
    option pursuant to Section 7(a), then the other Shareholder shall be granted
    the same option which will thereafter be exercisable from the 16th day until
    the 30th day after the delivery of the valuation report by the Accountant.

    (c) If after the 30th day following the delivery of the
    valuation report by the Accountant neither of the Shareholders has exercised
    its option pursuant to Sections 7(a) and (b) hereof, then the Non-Defaulting
    Shareholder shall have a new option to purchase the other Shareholder's
    interest in the Corporation at a price equal to 90% of the Fair Price. Such
    option shall be exercisable for a period of seven days.

    (d) If the Non-Defaulting Shareholder has not exercised its
    option pursuant to Section 7(c), then the other Shareholder shall have the same
    option which will thereafter be exercisable from the 38th day until the 45th
    day after the delivery of the valuation report by the Accountant.

    (e) The foregoing procedure shall be applied with successive
    seven-day options granted to the Non- Defaulting Shareholder and the other
    Shareholder at a price that shall be reduced by 10% of the Fair Price
    determined by the Accountant at the expiration of each party's option to
    purchase at the Fair Price, as so reduced, until any Shareholder decides to
    exercise its option.

    (f) For purposes of this Section 7, an Event of Default shall
    include:

    (i) a material default by either Shareholder in
    the observance or performance of any of the
    terms of this Agreement which default remains
    uncured for a period of sixty (60) days after
    receipt of reasonable notice thereof by the
    Defaulting Shareholder;

    (ii) a "change in control" of either Shareholder
    resulting in control by any person or
    corporation who is a competitor of the
    Shareholders. For purposes of this paragraph
    "change in control" shall mean (a) the
    acquisition of fifty-one percent (51%) or
    more of the voting capital stock of such
    Shareholder or (b) the ability to control the
    Board of Directors of such Shareholder; or

    (iii) a Shareholder shall file a petition seeking
    reorganization or relief under any applicable
    bankruptcy law or consents to the filing of
    any such petition or to the appointment of a
    receiver, liquidator, assignee, trustee,
    sequestrator (or other similar official) for
    it or a substantial part of its property.





    6
    7

    8. Requirement of Prior Consent of the Treasurer. Where the
    intended transfer of any Shares of the Corporation by a party (whether a party
    to this Agreement or a third party) under the provisions of this Agreement
    requires the consent of the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia ("The
    Treasurer") then such transfer shall be subject to such consent and
    notwithstanding anything else contained in this Agreement:

    (a) any offer made to or by any such party to purchase or
    acquire shares in the Corporation shall be deemed to be subject to that party
    obtaining the consent of The Treasurer;

    (b) any notice of election, acceptance or agreement by any
    such party to purchase or acquire the Shares shall be subject to a condition
    precedent to that party obtaining the consent of The Treasurer;

    (c) any period of time set out in this Agreement, by which
    any such party must purchase or pay for such Shares shall be deemed to be
    extended until 5 days after the consent of The Treasurer has been obtained or
    refused (or the acquisition prohibited);

    (d) the provisions of this Agreement shall be read and
    construed subject to the provisions of this Section.

    9. Deadlock.

    (a) In the event all of the Sodexho designees to the board of
    directors of the Corporation (the "Board of Directors"), as a group, or all of
    the CCA designees to the Board of Directors, as a group, fail to consent to any
    material matter considered by the Board of Directors, the vote of any other
    member of the Board of Directors who is not considered a CCA designee or a
    Sodexho designee pursuant to Section 13 hereof shall not be counted in such
    vote. In the event (i) such disagreement between the Sodexho designees and the
    CCA designees referred to in the preceding sentence remains unresolved for a
    period of thirty (30) days after the date of such meeting; or (ii) two
    successive meetings of the Board of Directors (each of which is called pursuant
    to at least 14 days' prior notice to occur at a reasonable time and place)
    either fail to occur or are not attended by a majority of the members of the
    Board of Directors (each of the matters referred to in clauses (i) or (ii)
    above being hereinafter referred to as a "Deadlock"), either Shareholder may
    send to the other Shareholder a written notice identifying the Deadlock and
    invoking the following procedures (the "Deadlock Notice").

    (b) In any case of a Deadlock under Section 9(a), each of the
    Shareholders shall within 10 days of a Deadlock Notice covering such Deadlock
    cause its members of the Board of Directors to prepare and circulate to the
    other Shareholders and the Board of Directors a memorandum setting out its
    position on the matter in dispute and its reason for adopting such position and
    each such memorandum shall be considered by each Shareholder who shall
    respectively use their reasonable endeavors in good faith to resolve such
    dispute. Any resolution of the matter by the Shareholders pursuant to this
    Section 9(b) shall be a final and binding determination of the matter.





    7
    8

    (c) In the event (x) a Deadlock arises under Section
    9(a)(ii), or if no resolution has occurred in accordance with the provisions of
    Section 9(b) within 30 days after delivery of the memorandum mentioned therein;
    and (y) if any such Deadlock shall prevent the Board of Directors from
    continuing to achieve its business purposes or its ability to honor its
    contractual commitments in any material respect, either of the Shareholders may
    by notice in writing to the Corporation cause the interests of the Shareholders
    in the Corporation to be transferred according to the procedure described in
    Section 7 above.

    (d) In no circumstances shall a Shareholder create an
    "artificial Deadlock" in order to invoke the provisions of this Section 9. For
    the purposes of this provision an "artificial Deadlock" shall be a Deadlock
    caused (other than in circumstances where the interests of the Shareholder
    conflicts with the interests of the Corporation) by a Shareholder or its
    appointees on the Board of Directors voting against a series of related issues
    or proposals in any case where the passage or approval of the same is required
    to enable the Corporation to carry on its business properly and efficiently.

    (e) The provisions of this Article 9 shall also apply in the
    event the Shareholders fail to agree to any material matter considered by the
    Shareholders and (i) such disagreement remains unresolved for a period of
    thirty (30) days after the date of such meeting; or (ii) two successive
    meetings of the Shareholders (each of which is called pursuant to at least 14
    days prior notice to occur at a reasonable time and place) either fail to occur
    or are not attended by a majority of the Shareholders.

    10. Non-Competition.

    (a) The Shareholders agree that, except as otherwise provided
    herein, they will conduct all of their business with respect to the Prison
    Management Business in the countries of Australia, New Zealand and Papua, New
    Guinea (the "Australian Zone") exclusively with each other. For purposes of
    this Section 10, Prison Management Business means the (i) design, construction,
    financing and "full management" of detention or correctional facilities with or
    without custodial services and/or (ii) the transportation of prisoners; it
    being understood that Sodexho may continue to provide food service, laundry,
    housekeeping, maintenance, etc. outside of the Corporation and that the
    provisions of such services by Sodexho at a rate of less than $10.00 (U.S.) per
    inmate per day (as such amount may be increased by the Board from time to time)
    shall not constitute "full management" and shall not constitute the Prison
    Management Business. In order to give effect to this decision, the
    Shareholders agree that unless unanimously approved by the Board of Directors
    in writing or except as otherwise permitted pursuant to this Agreement:

    (i) neither Shareholders nor any of their
    respective Affiliates will compete with the
    Corporation in the Prison Management Business
    in the Australian Zone.





    8
    9

    (ii) any third-party approach towards either
    Shareholder in relation to a Project (as
    defined herein) in the Australian Zone,
    whether in its individual capacity or as a
    Shareholder shall be immediately introduced
    to the Corporation. For purposes of this
    Section 10, a Project means any opportunity
    related to the Prison Management Business in
    the Australian Zone such as requests (with
    respect to a particular facility) for
    proposals and bids to governmental agencies
    and consulting agencies with respect to the
    Prison Management Business.

    (iii) neither Shareholders nor any of their
    respective Affiliates, shall alone or jointly
    with others acquire any material interest
    (more than 10%) in any company which is a
    competitor of the Corporation in the Prison
    Management Business in the Australian Zone
    (other than competitors for which the
    revenues related to the prison management
    business constitute less than 10% of the
    total revenues for such competitors).

    (b) The Shareholders agree that in the event of a breach of
    the provisions contained in Section 10(a) hereof, in addition to any other
    remedies available to any Shareholder in breach of any such provision shall pay
    to the other Shareholder an amount equal to one year's annual revenues
    generated by the Prison Management Business which is the subject of such
    breach.

    (c) If any of the restrictions set forth in Section 10(a)
    should for any reason be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
    the validity or enforcement of the remainder of such restrictions and covenants
    shall not thereby be adversely affected. If any provision of Section 10 shall
    be adjudicated to be invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed
    deleted, but only to the operation of such provision in the particular
    jurisdiction in which such adjudication was made; provided, that to the extent
    any such provision may be made valid and enforceable, in such jurisdiction by
    limitations on the scope of the activities, geographical area or time period
    covered, such provision shall be deemed limited to the extent, and only to that
    extent, necessary to make such provision enforceable to the fullest extent
    permissible under the laws and public policies applied in such jurisdiction.

    11. Confidentiality.

    (a) The Shareholders agree at all times during the term of
    this Agreement to hold in confidence and keep secret and inviolate all of the
    Corporation's confidential and proprietary information, including, without
    limitation, the Corporation's budgets, financial statements, development plans,
    and the information related thereto, and all unpublished matters relating to
    the business, property, trade secrets, proprietary rights, intellectual
    property, accounts, books, records, customers, and contracts of the Corporation
    which it may know or hereafter come to know; provided, however, that no such
    information, whether deemed confidential by the





    9
    10

    Corporation or not, shall be subject to the terms of this Section 11 if it is
    part of the public domain, through no fault of the Shareholder.

    (b) Each of the Shareholders covenant that the
    information described in 11(a) will be kept confidential by such Shareholder,
    the entities controlled by such Shareholder and the directors, employees, and
    representatives of any of them, using the same standard of care in safeguarding
    such information as such Shareholder employs in protecting its own proprietary
    information which it desires not to disseminate or publish and that such
    information shall only be used by the Shareholder in connection with the
    business of the Corporation.

    (c) No Shareholder shall at any time take, or cause to be
    taken any action, and shall not make, or cause to be made, any omission, which
    would be inconsistent with or impair in any way the rights of the Corporation
    in the information described in Section 11(a) above. The Shareholders
    acknowledge and agree that any unauthorized disclosure or use of the
    information described in Section 11(a) above would cause the Corporation
    irreparable injury or loss. Accordingly, each Shareholder acknowledges and
    agrees that in the event of a breach, or threatened breach, by any of them of
    any provisions of this Section 11, the Corporation shall be entitled to an
    injunction restraining such Shareholder from the disclosure or unauthorized use
    of any such information.

    12. Specific Performance.

    The Shareholders and the Corporation expressly agree that the
    Shareholders and the Corporation will be irreparably harmed and/or injured if
    this Agreement is not specifically enforced. Upon a breach or threatened
    breach of the terms, covenants, and/or conditions of this Agreement by any of
    the Shareholders or the Corporation, the other Shareholders and the Corporation
    shall, in addition to all other remedies, each be entitled to a temporary or
    permanent injunction, without showing any actual harm, injury, or damage to
    such other Shareholders or the Corporation, and/or a decree for specific
    performance, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

    13. Board of Directors. The Shareholders acknowledge and agree
    that each Shareholder shall be entitled to an equal number of nominees to the
    Board of Directors, and the Corporation's General Manager, who is currently
    Terry Lawson shall be a member of the Corporation's Board of Directors but
    shall not be considered a nominee of either Shareholder. Each Shareholder
    agrees (i) that in all elections of directors during the term of this
    Agreement, such Shareholder shall vote all Shares owned by it for the nominees
    of the other Shareholders, and (ii) that any change in the number of directors
    shall require the unanimous written consent of all Shareholders.

    14. Amendment to Articles of Association, etc. The Shareholders
    acknowledge and agree that the affirmative vote of seventy-five percent (75%)
    of the Holders of the Shares shall be required for (i) an amendment to the
    Corporation's Articles of Association, (ii) the issuance by the Corporation of
    any additional class "C" shares or other securities convertible into capital





    10
    11

    shares of the Corporation, or (iii) any merger or combination of the
    Corporation with or into any other entity.

    15. Term. Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement, and the
    respective rights and obligations of the parties hereto, shall continue and be
    effective for so long as the parties hereto are shareholders in the
    Corporation; provided, however, that Section 13 hereof shall terminate on the
    tenth anniversary of the date hereof, unless extended by the mutual agreement
    of the parties hereto.

    16. Notices.

    (a) Any notices required or permitted to be sent hereunder
    shall be mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or
    delivered by overnight courier service, or by facsimile transmission in the
    case of non-U.S. residents, to the following addresses, or such other addresses
    as shall be given by notice delivered hereunder, and shall be deemed to have
    been given three days after mailing, if mailed, or one business day.

    If to the Corporation, to:

    Corrections Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd.
    Level 4
    39 Sherwood Road
    Toowong, Queensland 4066
    Australia
    Attn: Terry Lawson

    With a copy to:

    Lees Marshall & Warnick, Solicitors
    Level 3 Banking Annexe
    Central Plaza One
    345 Queen Street
    Brisbane QLD 4000
    Australia
    Attn: Malcolm Marshall, Esq.





    11
    12

    If to CCA, to:

    Corrections Corporation of America
    102 Woodmont Boulevard, Suite 800
    Nashville, Tennessee 37205
    Attn: Doctor R. Crants

    With a copy to:

    Elizabeth E. Moore, Esq.
    Stokes & Bartholomew, P.A.
    424 Church Street, Suite 2800
    Nashville, Tennessee 37219

    If to Sodexho:

    Sodexho S.A.
    3, avenue Newton
    78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux
    FRANCE
    Attn: Jean-Pierre Cuny

    With a copy to:

    Ropes & Gray
    One International Place
    Boston, MA 02110
    Attn: Jane Goldstein, Esq.

    (b) Copies of any notices given, or required to be given to
    or by, any Shareholder under this Agreement shall also be furnished to the
    Corporation in accordance with the provisions of this Section 16.

    17. Legend.

    Each certificate evidencing any of the Shares shall bear a
    legend substantially as follows:

    THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO
    CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER AND MAY NOT BE SOLD,
    EXCHANGED, TRANSFERRED, ASSIGNED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED, OR
    OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF, EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND SUBJECT
    TO ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THAT CERTAIN SHAREHOLDERS'
    AGREEMENT, DATED OCTOBER 17, 1995, AMONG





    12
    13

    THE CORPORATION AND ITS SHAREHOLDERS, A COPY OF WHICH THE
    CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO THE HOLDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE
    WITHOUT CHARGE UPON REQUEST IN WRITING.

    18. Entire Agreement and Amendments.

    This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties
    with respect to the subject matter hereof and neither this Agreement nor any
    provision hereof may be waived, modified, amended, or terminated except by a
    written agreement signed by the parties hereto and in accordance with the terms
    of the Articles of Association, as amended.

    19. Acknowledgement of Holder. The parties hereto acknowledge and
    agree that the 22,500 Class "C" Shares held by CCA in accordance with the Stock
    Purchase Agreement shall be regarded by both parties as being held by Sodexho.

    20. Governing Law.

    This Agreement shall be governed by and be interpreted under
    the laws of Queensland without regard to the conflicts of law principles
    thereof. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the non-exclusive
    jurisdiction of any state or federal court located in Queensland over any
    action or proceeding to enforce any right under this Agreement. The parties
    further acknowledge that irrevocable damage would occur in the event that any
    of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their
    specific terms or were otherwise breached. Accordingly, the parties shall be
    entitled to an injunction to prevent breaches of the provisions of this
    Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof in any
    court in Queensland. This being in addition to any other remedy to which they
    may be entitled at law or equity.

    21. Successors and Assigns.

    This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, personal
    representatives, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the
    parties.

    22. Waivers.

    No waiver of any breach or default hereunder shall be
    considered valid unless in writing, and no such waiver shall be deemed a waiver
    of any subsequent breach or default of the same or similar nature.

    23. Severability.

    If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be
    illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity or
    unenforceability shall attach only to such provision and shall not in any
    manner affect or render illegal, invalid or unenforceable any other provision





    13
    14

    of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be carried out as if any such
    illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision were not contained herein.

    24. Descriptive Headings.

    Descriptive headings are for convenience only and are not
    deemed to be part of this Agreement.

    25. Counterparts.

    This Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more
    counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
    together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

    This Agreement was executed as of the date first set forth above.


    CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF
    AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.


    By:
    ------------------------------

    Title:
    ---------------------------


    CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF
    AMERICA


    By:
    ------------------------------

    Title:
    ---------------------------


    SODEXHO S.A.


    By:
    ------------------------------

    Title:
    ---------------------------